Should investigators solely rely on the condition of glass to draw conclusions about a fire or its cause?

Investigators should understand that the condition of glass after a fire can provide insights but is not definitive on its own. Glass can change properties when exposed to high heat and may demonstrate certain behaviors under specific conditions, but it can also be affected by various other factors, such as the type of glass, external temperature fluctuations, and exposure to different fuel sources.

Solely relying on glass condition can lead to misinterpretations or inaccurate conclusions about the fire's cause. For example, while melted glass might suggest extreme heat, it does not directly identify the fire's origin. Effective fire investigations require a comprehensive analysis that includes multiple types of evidence, such as witness statements, burn patterns, and material samples, combined to build a complete picture of the fire incident.

Thus, while the condition of glass might offer some useful information, it cannot be the sole basis for determining the cause or circumstances of a fire, making the position that further study has disproven reliance on glass alone a valid understanding in fire investigation.